How European Financial Institutions Will Prove Their AI Is Continually Safe
A practitioner workshop bringing together AI deployers, regulators and risk owners from European financial services to examine what a credible AI Act conformity package looks like in the live context of fraud detection, AML screening and sanctions monitoring.
Financial institutions deploying AI for fraud detection, AML and sanctions screening face a structural tension: the AI Act's conformity obligations were designed for systems that can be assessed at a point in time. But the systems that actually matter in finance are not static. They drift, retrain and adapt — and their risk profile shifts accordingly.
Article 43 conformity assessments and the technical documentation requirements under Annex IV were not written with continuous assurance in mind. Most institutions currently have no credible answer to the question: how will we demonstrate ongoing conformity after deployment?
- AI Act · Article 43
- Fraud Detection
- AML Screening
- Sanctions Monitoring
- Continuous Assurance